Yes, I am talking about masturbation. It is a fairly easy activity involving an erected penis, some lubricant, a steady hand, and some imagination. Of course you may want to make it even better with a tengatango sex toy and some pornography.

The Japanese masturbators are made specifically for men. The flagship products features a series of 5 on-a-cups that is capable of mimicking different sexual positions and sensations like fellatio, missionary sex position, orgy, bisexual fantasy, and more. Tenga latest invention is the Tenga Flip-Lite which comes in 2 variations: Black and White – named Solid Black and Melty White respectively.

By incorporating ergonomical and anatomically-correct designs, Tenga products are able to re-create the sensations on the penis for precise sensual stimulation and achieve the ultimate male masturbation pleasure (and an intense orgasm).

Why Whores Hate Tenga

Since 2006, it was reported that Tenga had sold over six million products and became the most popular male sex toy in Japan, Singapore, and worldwide. Online marketing activties are largely made by tengatango.com – the premier online retailer for Tenga.

The Company’s founder and inventor, Mr. Matsumoto, was a former car mechanic and hopes to create a male sex toy that would allow the men to have pleasure any time he desire. According to a Japan magazine, he was in part inspired by the nuts and bolts of the car engine and wants to utilize the latest that technology can offer into his sex toys.

Watch the video: Tenga masturbating cup for men

To-date, Tenga has a strong international following at the Tenga fan page on FaceBook, YouTube, and Twitter:

• Tenga on FaceBook: http://www.facebook.com/wwwtengatangocom
• Tenga on Twitter: http://twitter.com/tengatango
• Tenga on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/wwwtengatangocom

With all the success it is not surprizing that whores feel threatened by the sex toys.

In late March a secretive group of conservative Chinese Christian ladies surreptitiously took over the executive council of AWARE (Association of Women for Action and Research), an advocacy group that has done much to promote women’s rights. Half of the new council attend the same church. They were jolted into action by AWARE’s alleged pro-gay agenda, particularly in sex-education courses taught at some schools. “Are we going to have an entire generation of lesbians?” bemoaned Thio Su Mien, their 71-year old matriarch.

However, MOE’s assessment is that in some other aspects, the guide does not conform to MOE’s guidelines. In particular, some suggested responses in the instructor guide are explicit and inappropriate, and convey messages which could promote homosexuality or suggest approval of premarital sex.

As a man I should stay out of women’s affairs but as a concerned Singaporean, I cannot help but do my fair share by hailing the victory of Aware’s old guard over the usurpers last weekend at Suntec City.

There is no place for religious fervour in civil society. As Cherian George rightly put it in his article[1] today in The Straits Times, “God’s word cannot be the final word on how collective decisions are made in the public sphere’. One person’s God may not be another’s. Let us not impose on others one’s religious views. Civil groups work on uncoerced collective action around shared interests, purposes and values, and not on imposed directives from a group with a religious slant.

As a 50-something Singaporean and one who had been brought up in the shadow of Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew’s administration, I had all along thought that Singaporeans were like me — reticent and unwilling to take up the public cause — preferring instead to let the brave ones lead the charge and risk being rebuked by the establishment in the event they stray past the boundary markers. So, I was pleasantly surprised to learn that the younger generation — i.e. those younger than me — have not inherited my generation’s inertia but instead have risen to the occasion to protect their civic space from being overrun by people bent on promoting their voice as the only right voice of women.

Thankfully, the saga did not reach an impasse which would have necessitated the Government’s intervention to preserve the peace though I suspect some behind-the-scenes action might have taken place resulting in the various religious bodies here coming out with messages extolling tolerance and restraint by the different religious groups.

On the subject of sexual education programmes in our schools, I understand the toppled Aware committee’s concerns on the risk of homosexuality being preached to our students as a norm but I would like to point out that today’s students are totally unlike those of their generation. Today’s students have the Internet to turn to to find out all they need about sex. Parents cannot effectively exercise control over their access to such information on the Internet. They can trottle access at home but there are so many places outside the home where their children can access the Internet. What instead is needed is to put safe information on sex and sexuality in the hands of our children and teach them how to protect themselves against unwarranted intrusion into their private spaces thereby keeping them safe from peer influences. What certainly is not needed is simply preaching them that certain sexual practices are wrong because God has said it is wrong, for the young ones are impressionable and unstoppable when they have decided to do things they want to do and no amount of preaching can help. We were young once, remember?

So a comprehensive sexuality education programme that brings sexuality into the open and teaches students sensitive topics such as homosexuality in a neutral way will counter whatever inaccurate information that our youngsters might browse through in their Internet forages for information on sex and sexuality that they seek in their tumultous adolescent years.

[1] The Straits Times Page A21, 5 May 2009 ‘Pertinent lessons from a fisaco’